Bianco v. County of Nassau et al
| Angela S. Bianco |
| Lieutenant Vincent G. Boden, County of Nassau, Detective Gennaro DeStefano, Nassau County Police Department and Nassau County Police Department John and Jane Does 1-10 |
| 2:2016cv00444 |
| January 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Joan M. Azrack |
| Anne Y. Shields |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Based upon Plaintiff's previous requests to dismiss this action, the Court hereby dismisses this action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) without prejudice and without costs and attorney's fees to either party. This addresses Plaintiff's concern that the second sentence of Rule 41(a)(1)(B) precludes her from commencing a subsequent action because the Court is dismissing the action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), not pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(B). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case and mail a copy of this Order to pro se Plaintiff Angela Bianco. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 11/8/2018. (c/m to pro se) (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER granting 103 Motion for Reconsideration: Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is granted, and upon reconsideration, the Court amends, clarifies, and adheres to its prior rulings in that (1) Plaintiffs motion to amen d her Complaint is denied, with the exception that Massaro and Yao are deemed incorporated as defendants in the initial Complaint, which shall serve as the operative pleading herein; (2) Plaintiffs request to extend discovery is denied; and (3) Defen dants motion for a protective order is granted. The parties are directed to file a joint pre-trial order, consistent with Judge Azracks Individual Rules, by September 10, 2018. Defendants' counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the pro se Plaintiff, and to file proof of service on the docket sheet, by August 14, 2018. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 8/9/2018. (Minerva, Deanna)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting 69 Motion for Leave to File; granting in part 72 Motion to Compel. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiff's motions appearing as Docket Entries 69 and 72 are disposed of as follows: (1 ) Plaintiff's motion to amend, appearing as Docket Entry No. 69 , is granted. (2) Plaintiff's newly amended complaint, along with any corrections must be served and filed, in the manner described above, by 4/2/18. (3) Defe ndant shall respond to the Amended Complaint by 5/2/18. (4) Plaintiff may correct the errors in the exhibits attached to the proposed amended complaint. In filing her corrected exhibits, Plaintiff must provide the Clerk of the Court a flash d rive containing each exhibit that contains a correction. Such corrections must be filed by 4/2/18. (5) Plaintiff must identify to Defendant the specific information she wishes to redact, and confer as to the proposed redactions. On 3/16/18, P laintiff must file a letter with this Court outlining the specific redactions she wishes to make, and whether Defense Counsel has consented to the redactions. Upon receiving the letter the Court will make a determination as to whether such redactions shall be permitted. If Plaintiff's request is granted, she will be directed to provide the Clerk of the Court a flash drive containing each exhibit that contains a redacted document.(6) Discovery deadlines are extended as follows: Ex change of Expert reports completed by 4/9/18. Expert Depositions completed by 5/7/18. Final date to take the first step in dispositive Motion practice by 6/8/18. All discovery completed by 7/9/18. Submission of joint pre-trial order b y 8/7/18.Defense Counsel is directed to serve pro se Plaintiff with a copy of this Order, and file proof of service no later than 3/8/18. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 3/6/2018. (Casalini, Rosalinde) (Main Document 73 replaced on 3/6/2018) (Imrie, Robert)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 34 Motion for Reconsideration re Order on Motion for Discovery. For the reasons set forth on the attached Order, Plaintiff's motion filed as Docket No. 34 , is denied. Plaintiff is again reminded that she must familiarize h erself with the Federal Rules, this Court's rules, and the Local Rules of this Court and make every effort to coordinate discovery with opposing counsel so that this matter can proceed. In particular the parties are directed to work together, vi a email or telephone, to comply with the Court's scheduling order, which was so ordered under Docket No. 30 . Defense Counsel is directed to serve pro se Plaintiff with a copy of this Order and file proof of service no later than 5/15/17. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 5/12/2017. (Casalini, Rosalinde)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
