Crews v. CVS Incorperated et al
| Shaun Crews |
| CVS Incorperated, SCPO Matthews Cody and Midas Incorperated |
| 2:2016cv07209 |
| June 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Central Islip Office |
| Steven I. Locke |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, however Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against CVS and Mida s are sua sponte DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(1). Plaintiff's claims against P.O. Mathews shall proceed. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court issue a summons for P.O. Mathews and DIRECTS that the summons together with copies of the Complaint and this Order be forwarded to the United States Marshal Service for service upon P.O. Mathews forthwith. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U. S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the Pro Se Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 6/6/2017. C/M (Valle, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
