Smith Ovesen v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of America Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Smith Ovesen v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of America Inc. et al

Smith Ovesen v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of America Inc. et al

Case Number:	1:2004cv02849
Filed:	April 14, 2004
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit:	Airplane Product Liability
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 7, 2012	Filing 196 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 189 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 185 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Alfreda Smith Ovesen. The Court has carefully considered all of the parties' arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed above, they are either moot or without merit. For the reasons stated above, the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 189. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/5/2012) (mro)
March 1, 2012	Filing 185 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has carefully considered all of the parties' arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed above, they are either moot or without merit. For the reasons stated above, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted, and the motions in limine to exclude expert testimony are denied without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment dismissing the Complaint and closing this case. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/29/2012) (djc)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 7, 2012

Filing 196 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 189 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 185 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Alfreda Smith Ovesen. The Court has carefully considered all of the parties' arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed above, they are either moot or without merit. For the reasons stated above, the plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 189. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/5/2012) (mro)

March 1, 2012

Filing 185 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has carefully considered all of the parties' arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed above, they are either moot or without merit. For the reasons stated above, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted, and the motions in limine to exclude expert testimony are denied without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment dismissing the Complaint and closing this case. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/29/2012) (djc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith Ovesen v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of America Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?