PSG Poker, L.L.C. et al v. Derosa-Grund et al
| 1:2006cv01104 |
| February 14, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Denise L. Cote |
| James C. Francis |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER:#97889 Defendant DeRosa-Grund's April 20, 2009 motion for relief from judgment is denied. Plaintiffs' application for sanctions is denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/13/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jfe) Modified on 8/14/2009 (eef).
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER, that plaintiffs' opposition to the motion shall be due 5/15/09, and DeRosa-Grund's reply papers, if any, must be filed by 6/5/09...when filing any papers with the Court, the parties shall provide a courtesy copy to Chambers by sendin g them to the Court's Pro Se Office, Room 230, USDC, 500 Pearl St, NY NY 10007. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 58 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 57 Clerk's Judgment.( Response due by 5/15/2009. Reply due by 6/5/2009.) (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/23/09) Copies sent by chambers.(cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PSG Poker, L.L.C. et al v. Derosa-Grund et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
