Peters v. Metro North Commuter Railroad

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Peters v. Metro North Commuter Railroad

Peters v. Metro North Commuter Railroad

Plaintiff:	Patrick E Peters, Sr.
Defendant:	Metro North Commuter Railroad
Case Number:	1:2007cv01435
Filed:	February 28, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Deborah A. Batts
Nature of Suit:	Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action:	45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2010	Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER: Heidebrecht's report offers opinions on matters within his expertise as an ergonomic's expert, and Metro-North's Motion to Preclude Heidebrecht's report is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. There is a genui ne issue of material fact as to whether Peters should have known the cause of his injuries more than three years before commencing this action and as to whether Metro-North was negligent and caused Peters's injuries. As a result, Metro-North's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 9/28/2010) (jpo)
April 15, 2009	Filing 10 ORDER, re joint request for an extension of time to complete discovery: ( Discovery due by 6/8/2009. Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/3/2009. Status Conference set for 5/19/2009 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis. Trial shall begin on 7/20/09) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 4/15/09) (cd)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2010

Filing 33 OPINION AND ORDER: Heidebrecht's report offers opinions on matters within his expertise as an ergonomic's expert, and Metro-North's Motion to Preclude Heidebrecht's report is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. There is a genui ne issue of material fact as to whether Peters should have known the cause of his injuries more than three years before commencing this action and as to whether Metro-North was negligent and caused Peters's injuries. As a result, Metro-North's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 9/28/2010) (jpo)

April 15, 2009

Filing 10 ORDER, re joint request for an extension of time to complete discovery: ( Discovery due by 6/8/2009. Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/3/2009. Status Conference set for 5/19/2009 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis. Trial shall begin on 7/20/09) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 4/15/09) (cd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peters v. Metro North Commuter Railroad
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick E Peters, Sr.
Represented By:	Michael Flynn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Metro North Commuter Railroad
Represented By:	Jose Rafael Rios
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?