Almontaser v. New York City Department of Education et al
||New York City Department of Education, Joel Klein, Rosemary Stuart, City of New York, Michael Bloomberg and Dennis Walcott
||November 19, 2007
||New York Southern District Court
||Foley Square Office
||Sidney H. Stein
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 1, 2009
OPINION & ORDER:#97980 Almontaser participated in an interview with the New York Post on August 5, 2007, pursuant to her official duties as acting interim principal of the Khalil Gibran International Academy. As a result, the Court finds that, pursua nt to the standard set forth in Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), this speech is not protected by the First Amendment. Almontaser also failed to establish a property interest either in her position of interim acting principal of KGIA or in t he position of principal of the school for purposes of her Fourteenth Amendment due process claim. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for defendants. 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Bloomberg, Rosemary Stuart, Dennis Walcott, Joel Klein, New York City Department of Education, City of New York. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 9/1/09) (db) Modified on 9/2/2009 (eef).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.