Muench Photography, Inc. v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company et al
Plaintiff: Muench Photography, Inc.
Defendant: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company and R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Case Number: 1:2009cv02669
Filed: March 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Copyright Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 17:501 Copyright Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 144 OPINION & ORDER re: 136 MOTION to Strike Document No. 116 Plaintiff's Notice of Errata, filed by R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defend ants' Motion to Strike [dkt. no. 116]. The Clerk of Court is directed to strike that entry from the docket. The parties shall confer and inform the Court within twenty-one business days of this Order of the status of the litigation in light of t his ruling, including: any potential motions the parties wish to file; the parties' respective positions regarding Plaintiff's request for permission to file an interlocutory appeal in this case [dkt. no. 113]; and Defendants' motion to dismiss in the related case 13 Ci v. 834 [dkt. no. 7]. (As is further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/10/2015) (spo)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants on the claims set forth in Lines 239, 253, 267, 284, 378, and 434 of Exhibit A. The Court further grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants on statute of limitations grounds with respect to the printing of any images at issue in this suit that occu rred prior to March 23, 2006. Finally, the Court denies as premature the remainder of Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The parties shall confer and inform the Court by letter no later than September 9, 2013, as to how they wish to proceed. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/21/2013) (tn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muench Photography, Inc. v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Muench Photography, Inc.
Represented By: Maurice James Harmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?