Kang v. USA
| Jae Kang |
| USA |
| 1:2010cv03684 |
| May 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ORDER denying Motion to Vacate (2255) Jae Kang (8) Count 1 as to Jae Kang (8).... CONCLUSION: For the reasons discussed above, the Motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is denied. The Clerk is directed to close the m otion, and to close the related civil case, 10 Civ. 3684. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. SO ORDERED. (Also filed as doc. #317 in 06cr862 (JGK).) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/21/2010) (ja)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Government's time to move or respond is extended to November 26, 2010. As outlines in the Court's previous order, the Government shall submit transcripts of all proceedings, any briefs submitte d on appeal, and the record in any post-conviction proceedings along with its responsive papers. The Government shall also address, as appropriate, the proper procedural handling of this case under the Antiterrorism and effective death Penalty Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-132, 110 Stat 1214 (1996). The petitioner's time to reply to the Government's response is December 31, 2010. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/27/2010) (js)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION AND ORDER: The petitioner has failed to show that his claims are likely to have merit, and the application for the appointment of counsel is therefore denied without prejudice. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/17/2010) (jfe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kang v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jae Kang | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
