Sharkey v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
| Jennifer Sharkey |
| J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Joe Kenney, Adam Green and Leslie Lassiter |
| 1:2010cv03824 |
| May 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Robert W. Sweet |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
340
OPINION AND ORDER.....The defendants renewed Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law is granted as to back pay only as of April 1, 2010, and denied in all other respects. A conditional new trial is granted as to back pay damages for the perio d after April 1, 2010. The defendants alternative Rule 59 motion for a new trial as to Lassiter and J.P. Morgan is granted. Sharkeys request to be reinstated at J.P. Morgan in the event she ultimately prevails in this matter is denied. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 3/5/2018) (gr)
|
|
Filing
228
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 215 MOTION to Disqualify Judge, MOTION to Reassign Case filed by Jennifer Sharkey: I have been a United States District Court Judge for 39 years. Impartiality and the appearance of impartiality are requir ed to resolve difficult competing claims and to seek just result. This standard applies in all cases, including this one. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, Plaintiff's motion to reassign the case under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 and 455 is denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 4/14/2017) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
202
OPINION re: 159 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Referencing or Introducing Evidence Related to Plaintiff's Personal or Family Wealth At Trial. filed by Jennifer Sharkey, 161 MOTION in Limine to Preclude De fendants from Curtailing Plaintiff's Ability to Present Her Claims to the Jury and/or Limiting the Public's Access to the Upcoming Trial. filed by Jennifer Sharkey, 166 LETTER MOTION to Compel Defendants to State Whether Defend ants Will Produce Witness to Testify at Trial In Person addressed to Judge Robert W. Sweet from Douglas H. Wigdor dated January 9, 2017. filed by Jennifer Sharkey, 157 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Referencing or In troducing Evidence to Establish that Client A Did Not Violate a Statute Enumerated in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. filed by Jennifer Sharkey, 163 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Defendants from Referencing or Introducing the April 12, 2010 Non -final Determination of OSHA Regarding This Matter. filed by Jennifer Sharkey. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, Client A and Defendants' motion to protect Client A's identity and quash his trial subpoena is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' five unresolved motions in limine are granted in part and denied in part. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 1/26/2017) (cf)
|
|
Filing
138
OPINION re: 117 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Pleading filed by Leslie Lassiter, Joe Kenney, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Adam Green. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth above, the motion for leave to amend Defendants' answer is granted. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 12/23/2016) (cla)
|
|
Filing
108
OPINION re: 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Leslie Lassiter, Joe Kenney, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Adam Green. Since Sharkey fails to make a prima facie showing that her recommendation regarding Client A was a contributing factor in her firing, summary judgment is granted for the Defendants. It is so ordered. (As further set forth within this Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 10/9/2015) (ajs)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION: re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss. Accordingly, Plaintiff adequately alleges conduct she reported to Defendants and that Defendants had knowledge of Sharkey's protected activity. Based on the conclusions set forth above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 8/17/11) (js)
|
|
Filing
16
OPINION: Based upon the conclusions set forth above, the motion of Defendants to dismiss the Complaint is granted with leave granted to replead within twenty days. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 1/14/2011) (jfe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
