Severino v. USA
| Eddy Severino |
| USA |
| 1:2010cv05131 |
| July 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Oneida |
| Barbara S. Jones |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
OPINION & ORDER re: 15 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 14 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Eddy Severino. For the reasons set forth above, Severino's "Motion for Reconsideration" of this Court's October 12, 2018, Opinio n and Order is DENIED. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability, as Severino has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. See Matthews v. United States, 682 F.3d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 2012). The Court certif ies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and permission to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion docketed at No. 01 Cr. 302, ECF No. 192, and to close the case at No. 10 Civ. 5131. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 9/2/2022) (mml)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER: The Government is directed to file a response to Severino's motion for reconsideration by no later than August 2, 2022. Absent further order, the motion will be considered fully submitted as of that date. SO ORDERED.(I mailed a copy of this order to Mr. Severino on 7-13-2022 signed by William Ryan Courtroom Dep.)., ( Responses due by 8/2/2022) (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 7/13/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing
14
OPINION & ORDER re: 2 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion for a sentence reduction is DENIED. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because Severino has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2); Krantz v. United States, 224 F.3d 125, 127 (2d Cir. 2000). Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1 915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the criminal case (No. 01-cr-302) and related civil case (No. 10-cv-05131). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 10/12/2018) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Severino v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eddy Severino | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
