Martinez v. Capital One Bank, N.A.
| Geraldo F. Martinez |
| Capital One Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2010cv08028 |
| October 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
OPINION AND ORDER re: 65 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Joseph Cummings, Geraldo F. Martinez. For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' motion to file a second amended complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 65. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the parties shall submit a joint letter by January 15, 2016 setting forth proposed next steps in this action. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 1/4/2016) (mro)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER re: 50 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Joseph Cummings, Geraldo F. Martinez. For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED in pa rt and DENIED in part without prejudice to renewal in a form consistent with this Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs shall file any renewed motion, with a revised proposed second amended complaint no later than August 1, 2015. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 50. (As further set forth in this Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 7/13/2015) (mro)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 39 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Joseph Cummings, Geraldo F. Martine. For the reasons set forth within, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal in a form consistent with this Opinion and Order. Plaintiff shall file any renewed motion no later than September 5, 2014. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Doc. No. 39. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 8/20/2014) (ajs)
|
|
Filing
32
OPINION AND ORDER granting re: 19 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Capital One Bank, N.A. Plaintiffs' motion to strike is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court of is respectfully requested to terminate the motion located at Doc. No. 19 and close this case. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 3/27/2012) (cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Capital One Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Geraldo F. Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Charles Wayne Juntikka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Capital One Bank, N.A. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
