Maldonado v. The City of New York et al
Edgardo Maldonado |
The City of New York, Richard Alvarez, Guillermo Gil, Jose Sandobal, JohnPaul Slater, Mark Siley, Captain Richard Roe and C.O. John Doe |
1:2011cv03514 |
May 23, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
P. Kevin Castel |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 OPINION AND ORDER re: 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The City of New York, Richard Alvarez. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to Maldonado's (1) false arrest claim, (2) federal-and state-law malicious prosecution claims, (3) federal due-process claim, (4) state constitutional claims, (5) negligence claim, and (6) claim for negligent hiring, screening, retention, supervision, and training. Defendants' motion is denied as to Maldonado's fabrication-of-evidence claim. The parties shall appear for a pretrial conference on March 6, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close the motion pending at docket number 42 and to dismiss the City as a defendant in this matter. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/26/2014) (mro) |
Filing 26 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motion to compel is denied. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/21/2012) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (jfe) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.