Mahmood v. Research in Motion Ltd.
| Tahir Mahmood |
| Research in Motion Ltd. |
| 1:2011cv05345 |
| August 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Barbara S. Jones |
| Theodore H. Katz |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 256 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, this Court finds that laches presents an entire defense to plaintiff's inventorship claim. Plaintiff's action is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 5/16/2012) (pl) Modified on 5/16/2012 (pl).
|
|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 11 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint Pursuant to Rules 8(a) and 12(b)(6) of the FRCP filed by Research in Motion Ltd., 24 MOTION for Discovery Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d) filed by Tahir Mahmood. P laintiff's motion for discovery pursuant to Rule 56(d) is DENIED. For the reasons set forth above, summary judgment is DENIED as to Count I, and GRANTED as to Counts II-IV. Counts II-IV are DISMISSED with prejudice. This action shall proceed solely with respect to Count I. The parties are directed to confer on a schedule for discovery and to submit a proposed schedule to the Court no later than February 6, 2012. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 1/23/2012) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
