Seife v. National Institutes of Health et al
| Charles Seife |
| National Institutes of Health and Department of Health and Human Services |
| 1:2011cv06646 |
| September 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Richard J. Holwell |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER re: 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Charles Seife, 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiff's motion fo r summary judgment (Docket# 12) is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket# 20) is also granted in part and denied in part. The Government must produce to Seife copies of the requested waiver determina tions without redaction of the information regarding the SGEs'financial interests and relationships. The Government may redact from these forms the letter labels that indicate which financial interests belong in whole or in part to the spouse or dependent child of the SGE. The Government need not produce unredacted versions of the recusal lists. The Clerk is requested to enter judgment. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 6/11/2012) Copies Sent By Chambers. (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
