Ernst v. Dish Network, LLC et al
| Scott Ernst |
| Dish Network, LLC, Dish Network Service, LLC and Sterling Infosystems, Inc. |
| 1:2012cv08794 |
| December 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Victor Marrero |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
252
ORDER denying 215 Motion to Certify Class; granting 243 Letter Motion to Stay. WHEREAS, on September 14, 2015, Plaintiffs moved for class certification, seeking to certify three classes of contractor technicians in their claims under the Fai r Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. ("FCRA"). WHEREAS, on December 4, 2015, Defendants DISH Network L.L.C. and DISH Network Service L.L.C. (collectively, "Defendants" or "DISH") filed a motion for a stay, requesting the Court to reserve ruling on Plaintiffs' motion for class certification until after the Supreme Court issues a decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, No. 13-1339 (2015). It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' motion for a stay is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. It is further ORDERED that, within fourteen days of the Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo, the parties shall file a joint letter not to exceed three pages summarizing the decision's holding and its impact on this case. The joint letter shall include a proposed briefing schedule for any renewed motion for class certification. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Nos. 215 and 243. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/28/2016) (mro)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER & OPINION re: 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Dish Network Service, LLC, Dish Network, LLC, 76 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Scott Ernst. For the reasons discussed above, the Summary Report is a "consumer report" for purposes of the FCRA. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Dish's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close the motions at docket numbers 72 and 76. The parties shall appear for a status conference on October 3, 2014, at 11:10 a.m., when they shall inform the Court how they intend to proceed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/22/2014) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
