Etheridge-Brown et al v. America Media, Inc. et al
| Alicia Etheridge-Brown and Robert Brown |
| America Media, Inc. and Derrick Handspike |
| 1:2013cv01982 |
| March 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
OPINION AND ORDER: Alicia Etheredge-Brown and Robert Brown (together, "Plaintiffs") bring this action for defamation. The sole claim remaining in the case is against individual defendant Derrick Handspike. Accordingly, the Court declines t o exercise its discretion to grant a retroactive extension of time for service under Rule 4(m). For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' claim against Handspike is DISMISSED under Rule 4(m). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/14/2015) (kko)
|
|
Filing
17
OPINION AND ORDER re: 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by America Media, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant American Media's motion for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Entry No. 5. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/31/2014) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
