Mahon v. Doe et al
Kalonji Mahon |
Jane Doe and Deborah Moultrie |
1:2013cv02076 |
March 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Washington |
Ronnie Abrams |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 OPINION & ORDER re: 49 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 48 Clerk's Judgment, filed by Kalonji Mahon. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk of Court is requested to close the motion pending at docket entry 49 and to transmit the record of this decision to the Court of Appeals, see Dkt. 56. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 5/21/2015) (ajs) |
Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER re: 46 MOTION for Leave to File Surreply to Defendant's Reply filed by Kalonji Mahon, 36 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Roslyn McCall, Kimberly Williams, Deborah Moultrie. Defendants' motion to dismiss is grant ed in its entirety. Plaintiff has not alleged a plausible claim for interference with legal mail in violation of his right of access to the courts, nor has he plausibly alleged that the denial of his grievance - erroneous or not - amounted to a viola tion of any Due Process rights. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close the motions pending at ECF numbers 36 and 46, and to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 9/15/2014) (ajs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.