Sullivan v. Barclays PLC et al
| Stephen P Sullivan |
| Barclays PLC, Barclays Bank plc, Barclays Capital Inc., UBS AG, The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC and John Doe Nos. 1-50 |
| 1:2013cv02811 |
| April 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
593
ORDER A WARDING SERVICE AWARD TO PLAINTIFF: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: his Court has personal jurisdiction over Plaintiffs and Societe Generale (the "Parties") and all Settlement Class Members who have not timely and v alidly requested exclusion and subject matter jurisdiction over the Action to approve the Settlement Agreement and all exhibits attached thereto. Notice of the Fee and Expense Application was provided to potential Settlement Class Members in a reason able manner, and such notice complies with Rule 23(h)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due process requirements. The Court hereby awards a Service Award as follows in recognition of the recipient's contributions and reasonable expe nses related to the Action on behalf of the Settlement Class: $4,406.11 to California State Teachers' Retirement System; and as set forth herein. The Service Award maybe paid from the Settlement Fund upon entry of this Order, subject to the terms, conditions, and obligations of the Settlement Agreement which terms, conditions, and obligations are incorporated herein. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/31/2023) (ama)
|
|
Filing
564
ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING PROPOSED SETTLEMENT WITH SOCIETE GENERALE, SCHEDULING HEARING FOR FINAL APPROVAL THEREOF, AND APPROVING THE PROPOSED FORM AND PROGRAM OF NOTICE TO THE CLASS: Except for the terms defined herein, the Court adopts and in corporates the definitions in the Settlement Agreement for the purposes of this Order. The Court hereby appoints Lowey Dannenberg, P.C. and Lovell Stewart Halebian Jacobson LLP as Class Counsel to such Settlement Class for purposes of the Settlement , having determined that the requirements of Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are fully satisfied by this appointment. Plaintiffs are hereby appointed as representatives of the Settlement Class for purposes of the Settlement. T he Court appoints Citibank, N.A. to act as Escrow Agent for the Settlement Fund, which shall have such duties and responsibilities in such capacity as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. Settlement Conference set for 9/7/2023 at 02:00 PM in Co urtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge P. Kevin Castel. If the Settlement is terminated or is ultimately not approved, the Court will modify any existing scheduling order to ensure that the Settling Parties will have sufficient time to prepare for the resumption of litigation and further set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 4/18/2023) (rro)
|
|
Filing
551
ORDER AWARDING INCENTIVE AWARDS TO PLAINTIFFS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: This Court has personal jurisdiction over Plaintiffs and Credit Agricole (the "Parties") and all Settlement Class Members who have not timely an d validly requested exclusion and subject matter jurisdiction over the Action to approve the Settlement Agreement and all exhibits attached thereto. Notice of the Fee and Expense Application was provided to potential SettlementClass Members in a reas onable manner, and such notice complies with Rule 23 (h) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due process requirements. The Court hereby awards to CalSTRS recipient's last time and reasonable expenses related to the Action on behalf o f the Settlement Class: $ 226,347.12 CalSTRS. The Application of White Oak Fund L.P. and Stephen Sullivan are DENIED for the reasons stated in the record of the November 15, 2022 hearing. The reimbursement for loss time and expense may be paid f rom the Settlement Fund upon entry of this Order, subject to the terms, conditions, and obligations of the Settlement Agreement which terms, conditions, and obligations are incorporated herein. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 11/15/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing
546
ORDER: The fairness hearing is adjourned from October 26, 2022 to November 15, 2022 at 2 p.m. in Courtroom 11D. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/24/2022) ( Fairness Hearing set for 11/15/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 11D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (ks)
|
|
Filing
544
ORDER: The fairness hearing scheduled for October 4, 2022 is adjourned to October 26, 2022 at 3:30 p.m. SO ORDERED., ( Fairness Hearing set for 10/26/2022 at 03:30 PM before Judge P. Kevin Castel.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/22/2022) (ama)
|
|
Filing
286
ORDER denying 197 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. Because only FrontPoint Australian and CalSTRS can act as efficient enforcers of the antitrust laws, the Complaint's Sherman Act claims are dismissed as to all other plaintiffs on grounds of antitrust standing. The Complaint plausibly alleges the existence of a price-fixing conspiracy as to Count One only, and Count Two, Count Three and Count Four are therefore dismissed in their entirely. The Complaint fails to state a claim as to Counts Five through Seven except as to defendants UBS and Rabobank. Counts Eight and Nine are dismissed because plaintiffs' RICO claims are based on extraterritorial pr edicate acts. The Complaint plausibly alleges claims of unjust enrichment and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as to Counts Ten and Eleven. Because plaintiffs have not made out a prima facie case of personal jurisdicti on over any Foreign Defendant, the claims against all Foreign Defendants are dismissed. Therefore, all claims are dismissed in this action, except to the extent that Count One, Count Ten and Count Eleven are asserted against the Citi defendants and the J.P. Morgan defendants. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Docket # 197.) (As further set forth in this Order.). (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/21/2017) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
