Fraticelli et al v. MSG Holdings, L.P. et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Fraticelli
Defendant: MSG Holdings, L.P. and The Madison Square Garden Company
Case Number: 1:2013cv06518
Filed: September 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Jesse M. Furman
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 85 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, I approve the settlement in this matter and award plaintiffs' counsel $50,000 in attorneys' fees and costs. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mark this matter closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 10/16/2018) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ne)
July 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 75 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' application for conditional certification of the 216(b) collective and the putative class is denied. Counsel are directed to report to Courtroom 18-A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York on July 18, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. to discuss the next steps to be taken in this matter. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 7/2/2018) (ne)
December 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 72 OPINION AND ORDER: For all the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for appointment of class counsel is granted and the remaining motions are denied without prejudice. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 12/10/2015) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (kgo)
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 29 MOTION to Certify Class Conditionally and for Court Authorized Notice, Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b) filed by Christopher Fraticelli. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs in this case have not made that showing. Accordingly, their motion for conditional certification is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 29. All dates and deadlines remain in effect. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/7/2014) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fraticelli et al v. MSG Holdings, L.P. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Fraticelli
Represented By: Lloyd Robert Ambinder
Represented By: Jeffrey Kevin Brown
Represented By: Suzanne Brooke Leeds
Represented By: Daniel Harris Markowitz
Represented By: Michael Alexander Tompkins
Represented By: Charles R. Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MSG Holdings, L.P.
Represented By: Sam Scott Shaulson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Madison Square Garden Company
Represented By: Sam Scott Shaulson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?