Yahoo! Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Petitioner: Yahoo! Inc.
Respondent: Microsoft Corporation
Case Number: 1:2013cv07237
Filed: October 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Robert P. Patterson
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 12
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 OPINION AND ORDER: Yahoo did not meet the heavy burden required to show that the Emergency Arbitrator exceeded his authority under 10 U.S.C. § 10(a)(4). See ReliaStar, 564 F.3d at 86 (If the parties agreed to submit an issue for arbitration, we will uphold a challenged award as long as the arbitrator offers a barely colorable justification for the outcome reached.) Yahoo similarly did not present sufficient evidence to show that that this Award was one of the exceedingly rare instances wher e an arbitrator manifestly disregards the law. See T.Co Metals, 592 F.3d at 340. Therefore, upon a review of the Award and upon due consideration of the arguments made by both parties, Yahoos motion to vacate must be denied. Finally, given that the p etition to vacate the Award is without merit and given the interest in enforcement of the equitable award made by the Arbitrator, the arbitration award should be confirmed. See 9 U.S.C. § 9 (a court must grant such an order [confirming an arbitr ation award] unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected). Therefore, Yahoos motion to vacate the arbitration award is DENIED. Microsofts cross-petition to confirm the arbitration award is GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 10/21/2013) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Yahoo! Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Microsoft Corporation
Represented By: Christopher R. Hagale
Represented By: Richard Scott Goldstein
Represented By: Carolyn J. Frantz
Represented By: Steven E. Derringer
Represented By: Philip S. Beck
Represented By: Mark Shawn Ouweleen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Yahoo! Inc.
Represented By: Patrick George Rideout
Represented By: Robert Alexander Fumerton
Represented By: Alexander C Drylewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?