Whitehaven S.F., LLC v. Spangler et al
Petitioner: Whitehaven S.F., LLC
Respondent: Steven Spangler, Lance Wittry, Wittry Law Offices and Harvey Thatcher
Case Number: 1:2013cv08476
Filed: November 26, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OPINION AND ORDER re: 32 MOTION to Enforce Judgment filed by Wittry Law Offices, Lance Wittry. For the reasons set forth above, the Wittry Respondents' motion to enforce the Opinion and Order is DENIED. The clerk of the court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion. (Doc. 32). It is SO ORDERED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/29/2016) (kko) Modified on 3/29/2016 (kko).
October 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 21 MOTION to Stay re: 18 Clerk's Judgment, pending appeal filed by Steven Spangler, Wittry Law Offices, Lance Wittry. For the reasons set forth above, Respondents' motion to stay is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion (Doc. 21 ). It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/31/2014) (ama)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION to Compel filed by Whitehaven S.F., LLC. For the reasons set forth within, Petitioner's motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED with respect to Respondent Spangler and the Indiana Proceeding is stayed as between Spangler and Whitehaven. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion (Doc. 9) and close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/10/2014) (ajs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitehaven S.F., LLC v. Spangler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Whitehaven S.F., LLC
Represented By: Eileen Theresa Rohan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven Spangler
Represented By: Daniel Lance Wittry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Lance Wittry
Represented By: Daniel Lance Wittry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Wittry Law Offices
Represented By: Daniel Lance Wittry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Harvey Thatcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?