United States of America v. East River Housing Corp.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District United States of America v. East River Housing Corp.

United States of America v. East River Housing Corp.

Plaintiff:	United States of America
Defendant:	East River Housing Corp.
Case Number:	1:2013cv08650
Filed:	December 5, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit:	Housing/Accommodations
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2015	Filing 96 OPINION AND ORDER re: 30 MOTION to Dismiss and/or Summary Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff's Fifth Cause of Action filed by East River Housing Corp., 22 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Second and Eleventh Affirmative Defe nses filed by United States of America, 27 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by East River Housing Corp. For the reasons set forth above, the Governments motion to strike Defendant's Second Affirmative Defense is G RANTED; Defendant's motion for summary judgment and to sever the Amended Complaint's remaining counts pertaining to Eisenberg and Gilbert is DENIED; and Defendant's motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment regarding the Government 's Fifth Cause of Action is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions (Docs. 22, 27, 30). It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/02/2015) (ama) (Main Document 96 replaced on 3/2/2015) (jar).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 2, 2015

Filing 96 OPINION AND ORDER re: 30 MOTION to Dismiss and/or Summary Judgment Dismissing Plaintiff's Fifth Cause of Action filed by East River Housing Corp., 22 MOTION to Strike Defendant's Second and Eleventh Affirmative Defe nses filed by United States of America, 27 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by East River Housing Corp. For the reasons set forth above, the Governments motion to strike Defendant's Second Affirmative Defense is G RANTED; Defendant's motion for summary judgment and to sever the Amended Complaint's remaining counts pertaining to Eisenberg and Gilbert is DENIED; and Defendant's motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment regarding the Government 's Fifth Cause of Action is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions (Docs. 22, 27, 30). It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/02/2015) (ama) (Main Document 96 replaced on 3/2/2015) (jar).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. East River Housing Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By:	Elizabeth Tulis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: East River Housing Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?