Intellectual Property Watch et al v. United States Trade Representative
| Intellectual Property Watch and William New |
| United States Trade Representative |
| 1:2013cv08955 |
| December 18, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, USTR's motion for summary judgment on the remaining communications is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/30/2018) (jwh) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
103
OPINION AND ORDER re: 90 MOTION for Reconsideration Pursuant to Rule 60(b) filed by William New, Intellectual Property Watch. Both Plaintiffs' and USTR's motions for summary judgment are denied at this time, and will b e revisited after USTR has the opportunity to make further submissions establishing that the information and advice contained in the withheld ITAC Communications were submitted in confidence. Once again, those additional submission are due on or befo re September 30, 2016, Plaintiffs' required response is due on or before October 31, 2016, and USTR's optional reply is due on or before November 14, 2016. Plaintiffs' Rule 60(b) motion is denied in substantial part, with the small exc eption of the six documents withheld solely because they contained proposals made by ITAC members. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 90. It is SO ORDERED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Brief due by 9/30/2016. Reply to Response to Brief due by 11/14/2016., Responses to Brief due by 10/31/2016) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/31/2016) (kko)
|
|
Filing
13
OPINION AND ORDER re: 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct. The Court DENIES the Motion to Amend as moot, in light of its previous Order. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion (Doc. 12). Chambers will mail copies of the inst ant decision, as well as the Court's previous Order, Doc. 10, to Mr. Kirsch at 1211 S. Eads Street, #211, Arlington, VA 22202, and P.O. Box 423364, Kissimmee, FL 34742-3364, the two addresses included in Mr. Kirsch's Motion to Amend (Doc. 12 at 7-8). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 2/28/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
