Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. v. Del Monte Corporation
Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. |
Del Monte Corporation |
1:2013cv08997 |
December 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
J. Paul Oetken |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 69 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims in Del Monte Foods, Inc.'s Second Amended Counterclaims. filed by Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. For the reasons that follow, Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss is gra nted in part and denied in part...For the foregoing reasons, Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss Del Monte Foods counterclaims is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Del Monte Foods has asserted counterclaims for conduct prior to Se ptember 10, 2010, Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss is DENIED as to counterclaims concerning subsequent conduct, as well as the counterclaim for declaratory judgment. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Combination products that combine fresh fruit and either fresh vegetables or fresh produce, but the motion is DENIED as to products that combine nonfresh fruit with vegetables or produce. Finally, Fresh Del Montes motion to dismiss the counterclaim for termination of the License is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at docket number 69. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 1/20/2016) (mt) |
Filing 90 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated in this Opinion and Order, FDP's motion to compel production of the identified email communications between DMFI and its licensees (Docket #54) is granted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 5/28/2015) (rjm) |
Filing 38 OPINION AND ORDER re: 25 MOTION for Leave to File Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff's First Amended Answer and Counterclaims . filed by Del Monte Foods, Inc.. For the reasons stated herein, defendant/counterclaim-plaintiff DM FI's motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims (Docket # 25) is granted. The proposed pleading shall be filed forthwith. The parties should consult on the adjustments that will need to be made to the existing discovery schedule and make an appropriate application to the Court. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 12/8/2014) (kgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.