Continental Industries Group, Inc. v. Altunkilic
Plaintiff: Continental Industries Group, Inc.
Defendant: Mehmet Altunkilic
Case Number: 1:2014cv00790
Filed: February 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pd Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER: In light of the legal authorities and evidentiary materials submitted with Plaintiffs Objections dated April 29, 2020, Dkt. No. 85, which had not been previously presented, the Report and Recommendation dated April 16, 2020, Dkt. No. 84, is hereby withdrawn. I will review the record now that it is has been more fully developed and provide Judge Torres with a revised Report and Recommendation. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 5/1/2020) (jca)
February 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER: Accordingly, no later than March 9, 2020, Plaintiff shall make a further submission to the Court with respect to its claimed damages and costs. In this submission, Plaintiff is specifically directed to explain: (1) whether Mr. Karabey' s statement, upon information and belief, rather than on personal knowledge, that the identified suppliers and customers have shifted their business from CIG to Plasmar, is sufficient as an evidentiary matter for purposes of authentication (citing legal authority, if possible); (2) how the figure representing expected lost profits ($33,164.206.63) was calculated; and (3) why it chose 60% as the applicable rate "to account for market and other factors" (and to explain wh at those "other factors" are), with specific reference to the supporting documentation already submitted or documentation that Plaintiff provides with its further submission. Thus, where supporting documentation is unavailable or does n ot exist, or where Plaintiff has relied on reasoned estimates, Plaintiff should explain this to the Court in its further submission. Moreover, any requests for costs must be supported by documentary evidence justifying such an award. Plaintiff sho uld also include a paragraph or paragraphs setting forth the legal basis for any requested award of costs. Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with a copy of any supplemental documents filed with the Court, including a copy of this Order, and file a certificate of service. Defendant's response, if any, to plaintiff's papers will be due by March 23, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 2/26/2020) (jca)
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER ADOPTINGREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 65 Report and Recommendations. CIG seeks compensatory damages in the amount of $28,242,52, punitive damages in the amount of $56,485,048, and a declaratory judgment. In his Report and Recom mendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 65, Judge Cott determines that no damages or declaratory relief [should] be awarded because CIG has not stated any actionable claim for relief. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons stated above , the Court concurs with the recommendation of Judge Cott that Plaintiff does not state a single actionable claim. Accordingly, the R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff is not entitled to any damages or declaratory relief. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/27/2018) (cf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Continental Industries Group, Inc. v. Altunkilic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Continental Industries Group, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Terrance Conway
Represented By: Nicole Ann Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mehmet Altunkilic
Represented By: Robert Howard Rickner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?