Perkins v. 199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East et al
Plaintiff: Craig Perkins
Defendant: 199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East and Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center
Case Number: 1:2014cv01681
Filed: March 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Bronx
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons in this Memorandum and Order, the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket no. 100) is granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Granting 100 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 10/31/2016) Copies transmitted this date. (rjm)
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Hospital's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative for partial summary judgment, is denied. However, Perkins's NYLL claim is barred to the extent it pertains to the time period up to and including March 21, 2013. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 63. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/11/2015) (kl) Modified on 6/11/2015 (kl).
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION & ORDER: re: 33 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by 199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East, 28 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center. For the foregoing reasons, the Court dismisse s the Amended Complaint in its entirety. The dismissal is with prejudice as to Counts One through Four, and without prejudice as to Counts Five and Six. Any Second Amended Complaint must be filed by October 1, 2014, and defendants must file their r espective Answers or other responsive pleadings by October 15, 2014. Failure to file an amended complaint by October 1, 2014, absent leave of the Court, will result in the Court's converting this dismissal of Perkins' FLSA and NYLL claims without prejudice into dismissal with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 28 and 33.(Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 9/17/2014) (djc) Modified on 9/17/2014 (djc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perkins v. 199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East
Represented By: Richard Lee Dorn
Represented By: Gene Micah Wissinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center
Represented By: Philip F. Repash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?