Royal Park Investments SA/NV v. U.S. Bank National Association
Royal Park Investments SA/NV |
U.S. Bank National Association |
1:2014cv02590 |
April 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of U.S. |
Victor Marrero |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 413 ORDER terminating 406 Motion for Discovery; terminating 408 Motion for Extension of Time; terminating 412 Motion to Compel. Orders as per conference held yesterday, September 12, 2018. The Court memorializes the following directives: 1. The parties shall meet and confer to discuss a discovery schedule that incorporates a ninety-day extension of time. The parties shall submit a joint letter by September 21, 2018, setting forth their proposed schedule. Should the parties have disagre ements as to the proposed schedule, they shall set forth their differing views in the joint letter. 2. The parties shall meet and confer to discuss Royal Park's responses to U.S. Bank's Contention Interrogatories, and whether and when any amendment to the responses should be made. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close Dkt. Nos. 406, 408, and 412. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 9/13/2018) Copies Sent By Chambers. (mml) |
Filing 403 ORDER denying 396 Letter Motion to Stay. For the foregoing reasons, Royal Parks request for a stay (Dkt. 396) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 8/13/2018) Copies Faxed By Chambers. (ama) |
Filing 391 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Royal Park is free to spend time and resources on efforts it believes will further its case. However, given the extremely low likelihood that sampling evidence will be permitted in this case, and given the burdens imposed, it is not proportionate to the needs of the case for Royal Park to pursue sampling-related discovery. Defendant's motion for a protective order is GRANTED. So ordered. Motions terminated: 371 LETTER MOTION for Discovery Renewed Motion for Protectiv e Order re Sampling addressed to Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger from Benjamin P. Smith dated March 5, 2018. Document filed by U.S. Bank National Association. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 7/9/2018). Copies transmitted to all counsel of record. (rjm) |
Filing 332 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 179 Motion for Sanctions. The defendant in this action, U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank"), has moved pursuant to Rule 37 (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to preclude the plaintiff, Roya l Park Investments SA/NV ("Royal Park"), from introducing proof of damages as a sanction for failing to comply with a discovery order. U.S. Bank also seeks an order precluding Royal Park from serving as a class representative in this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons discussed, U.S. Bank's motion for sanctions (Docket no. 179) is denied, as is Royal Park's application for an award of attorneys' fees. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 10/19/2017) Copies Sent By Chambers. (cf) |
Filing 161 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Royal Park's application is granted, and the notices of deposition for Fabrice Susini, Stefaan De Doncker, and Rafael Martinez are quashed without prejudice to reinstituting the latter two after the depositions of Danny Frans and Koen Weemaes have been completed. So ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 1/25/2017) Copies transmitted this date. (rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.