Smith v. City of New York et al
| Theodore Smith |
| City of New York, New York City Department of Education & New York City Department of Investigation and Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District |
| 1:2014cv02690 |
| April 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Naomi Reice Buchwald |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. To summarize: The DOI and SCI are improper defendants because they lack the capacity to be sued; the § 1983 and breach-of-contract claims are barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel and also by the applicable statutes of limitations; and the § 1983 and ERISA claims fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Therefore, defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 19) is granted and the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Granting 19 Motion to Dismiss. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 9/3/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rjm)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons in this Memorandum and Order, the motion for recusal is denied. Denying 29 Motion for Recusal. (Signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on 4/7/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rjm).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
