CCM Rochester, Inc. v. Federated Investors, Inc.
Plaintiff: CCM Rochester, Inc.
Defendant: Federated Investors, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv03600
Filed: May 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Valerie E. Caproni
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 98 OPINION & ORDER re: 76 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Federated Investors, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, Federated's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Dkt. No. 76 and close this case. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 2/10/2017) (cla)
November 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 OPINION & ORDER re: 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Federated Investors, Inc.: Given the state of the economy during the time period that is at issue, the fact that CCM received any payout based on growth of revenue is impressive. Mo reover, the fact that marketing may not have occurred exactly as discussed during the courtship of CCM is some evidence, but it is not overwhelmingly strong circumstantial evidence, of Federated's intent at an earlier, more economically-upbea t time. CCM has adequately alleged that Federated never intended to follow through on its representations that if its acquisition offer was accepted Federated would support the growth and expansion of the Clover products and that Federated made th ose misrepresentations to induce CCM to agree to backload a portion of the consideration through future payments tied to growth. In short, CCM's claim of fraud is at the edge of plausibility, but it is enough to cross "the line between po ssibility and plausibility of 'entitlement to relief.'" Twombly, 550 U.S. at 557. Similarly, CCM has adequately alleged a breach of contract claim based on allegations that Federated's acts and omissions during the Earnout Perio d were intentionally undertaken to harm CCM's Earnout Payments in breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Whether CCM can adduce proof to demonstrate these claims remains to be seen. Count Two of the Complaint is DISMISSED. In all other regards, Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Entry 8. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 11/25/2014) (tn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CCM Rochester, Inc. v. Federated Investors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CCM Rochester, Inc.
Represented By: Marc E. Kasowitz
Represented By: Mark Paul Ressler
Represented By: Trevor J. Welch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federated Investors, Inc.
Represented By: Tracy V. Schaffer
Represented By: Jayant W. Tambe
Represented By: Heidi Ann Wendel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?