Coleman v. Yahoo Internet Services et al
Jason L. Coleman |
Yahoo Internet Services, Asus Hardware and Verizon |
1:2014cv03828 |
May 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Bronx |
Loretta A. Preska |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Mailed a copy of 3 Order of Dismissal, to Jason L. Coleman 880 Tintin Ave. Apt. 2JE Bronx, NY 10456. (ca) |
Mailed notice of Right to Appeal re: 5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), to Jason L. Coleman880 Tintin Ave.Apt. 2JEBronx, NY 10456. (ca) |
Filing 5 CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 6/24/2014) (djc) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Loretta A. Preska. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (djc) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1651: By order dated April 23, 2014, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Coleman v. City of New York, No. 13-CV-8870 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 23, 2014). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to comply with the Court's April 23, 2014 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 6/24/2014) (djc) |
Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: 3 Order of Dismissal, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (djc) |
Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: 5 Judgment - Sua Sponte (Complaint), to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (djc) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Asus Hardware, Verizon, Yahoo Internet Services. Document filed by Jason L. Coleman.(laq) |
Filing 1 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Jason L. Coleman.(laq) |
Case Designated ECF. (laq) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.