Energy Intelligence Group Inc. et al v. Jefferies LLC et al
| Energy Intelligence Group Inc. and Energy Intelligence Group (UK) Limited |
| Jefferies LLC and Jefferies International Limited |
| 1:2014cv04115 |
| June 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Robert P. Patterson |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim is DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs' claims of direct and contributory infringement against JIL for infringement of the WGI and IOD co pyrighted works; DENIED as to Plaintiffs' claims of direct infringement against Jefferies for infringement of the WGI and IOD copyrighted works; and GRANTED with respect to the claim against Jefferies for infringement of the OD newsletter. The O D claim is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel shall appear for a conference on April 15, 2015 at 9:00 AM. re: 13 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 filed by Jefferies LLC, Jefferies International Limited. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/31/2015) Copies Sent By Chambers. (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
