Gao v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
Plaintiff: Harry Gao
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2014cv04281
Filed: June 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Crotty
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER granting 102 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. WHEREAS, the Court, having considered the Joint Motion for Approval of Final Settlement Distribution, and otherwise being fully informed, HEREBY ORDERS Class Action Administrator KCC to dist ribute the remaining funds cy pres, as follows: (a) $27,784.63 to the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, and; (b) $27,784.62 to the National Consumer Law Center. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2021.. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 3/3/2021) (ks)
June 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 OPINION & ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss (Notice of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint). filed by JPMorgan Chase & Co., Chase Bank USA, N.A. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is grante d with respect to Plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and fraudulent inducement. As to fraudulent inducement, the Court grants leave to replead but only in the event that P laintiffs can allege actionable misrepresentations with the specificity required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) by June 29, 2015. Defendants' motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim and the OCSPA and FDUTPA claims is denied. The parties are directed to file a civil case management plan by July 2, 2015. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Number 26., ( Amended Pleadings due by 6/29/2015.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 6/9/2015) (lmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gao v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harry Gao
Represented By: Caitlin Duffy
Represented By: Shelly L Friedland
Represented By: Richard Moss Golomb
Represented By: Kenneth Jay Grunfeld
Represented By: Barbara Ellen Olk
Represented By: Steven D. Resnick
Represented By: Ted E. Trief
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Represented By: Hanna A. Baek
Represented By: Noah Adam Levine
Represented By: Alan Schoenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Represented By: Hanna A. Baek
Represented By: Noah Adam Levine
Represented By: Alan Schoenfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?