Immigrant Defense Project et al v. United States Immigration and Costoms Enforcement et al
| Immigrant Defense Project, Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama and Center for Constitutional Rights |
| United States Immigration and Costoms Enforcement and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 1:2014cv06117 |
| August 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 52 MOTION for Reconsideration of Court's Order on Partial Summary Judgment filed by Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama, Center for Constitutional Rights, Immigrant Defense Project. For the foregoing rea sons, Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The parties shall confer and agree upon additional custodians and search terms for a further records search of the ERO and H.S.I. SAC field offices in question. See Nat'l Day Laborer Org. Network v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enft Agency, 877 F. Supp. 2d 87, 11112 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (directing the parties to agree on search terms and protocols" and cautioning plaintiffs to be reasonable in their demands"). The parties shall submit a joint proposal to the Court on or before June 23, 2017. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Number 52. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/16/2017) (ama)
|
|
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER re: 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Adequacy of Search. filed by Hispanic Interest Coalition of Alabama, Center for Constitutional Rights, Immigrant Defense Project, 37 CROSS MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment . filed by United States Immigration and Costoms Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security. For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on the question of the adequacy of Defendants' search is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' cross-motion for partial summary judgment on the same question is also granted in part and denied in part. Defendants are directed to carry out the following additio nal searches: (1) in the ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Buffalo and New York Field Offices, the ICE Office of Professional Responsibility, and the ICE Homeland Security Investigations New York Office, Defendants shall, within sixty days, conduct an additional search using the singular form of relevant plural nouns; (2) in ICE's OPA, Defendants shall, within sixty days, carry out a search reasonably calculated to respond to Plaintiffs' request; and (3) barring an applicab le exemption to be addressed in future briefings, Defendants shall produce a responsive sample of data from ICE's LESA component. All other aspects of Defendants' search are held to be adequate under FOIA. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Number 30 and Docket Number 37. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/23/2016) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
