Seals v. Kardashian et al
Plaintiff: Tina Seals
Defendant: Kim Kardashian, Kanye West and Fob North West
Case Number: 1:2014cv06220
Filed: July 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Loretta A Preska
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2014 Filing 8 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Tina Seals. USCA Case Number 14-3075. Ordered that the appeal is DISMISSED. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 12/11/2014. (nd)
September 2, 2014 Received returned mail re: #3 Order Granting IFP Application. Mail was addressed to Tina Seals at P.O. Box 631, New York, NY 10166 and was returned for the following reason(s): Not Deliverable as Addressed - Unable to Forward. (sc)
September 2, 2014 Re-Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application to Tina Seals at P.O. Box 631, New York, NY 10116. (sc)
August 19, 2014 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #7 Notice of Appeal. (tp)
August 19, 2014 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #5 Judgment, #1 Complaint filed by Tina Seals, #6 Letter filed by Tina Seals, #2 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Tina Seals, #4 Order of Dismissal, #3 Order Granting IFP Application, #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Tina Seals were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (tp)
August 15, 2014 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #5 Judgment, #4 Order of Dismissal. Document filed by Tina Seals. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. (Attachments: #1 Motion for IFP). (tp)
August 15, 2014 Appeal Remark as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Tina Seals. IFP DENIED 08/08/2014. (tp)
August 15, 2014 Appeal Fee Due: for #7 Notice of Appeal. Appeal fee due by 8/29/2014. (tp)
August 13, 2014 Filing 6 LETTER from Tina Seals dated 8/13/2014 re: Rationale supporting lawsuit submitted to Pro Se. Document filed by Tina Seals.(sac)
August 13, 2014 Mailed notice of Right to Appeal re: #4 Order of Dismissal, #5 Judgment, toTina SealsP.O. Box 631New York, NY 10166. (ca)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CIVIL JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the complaint is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this judgment to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/8/2014) (lmb)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff's complaint, filed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (i). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/8/2014) (lmb)
August 8, 2014 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #4 Order of Dismissal, #5 Judgment, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (lmb)
August 8, 2014 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Loretta A. Preska. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (lmb)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 8/8/2014) (sbr)
August 8, 2014 Mailed a copy of #3 Order Granting IFP Application to Tina Seals. (sbr)
July 15, 2014 Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Tina Seals.(moh)
July 15, 2014 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fob North West, Kim Kardashian, Kanye West. Document filed by Tina Seals.(moh)
July 15, 2014 Case Designated ECF. (moh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Seals v. Kardashian et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Seals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kim Kardashian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kanye West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fob North West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?