Santiago v. Commissioner of NewYork City Corrections et al
| Epifanio Santiago |
| Commissioner of NewYork City Corrections, Joseph Ponte and Frances |
| 1:2014cv06473 |
| August 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Loretta A. Preska |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
OPINION & ORDER re: 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Frances, Joseph Ponte. For these reasons, the Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case, and to mail a copy of this decision to plaintiff at the address on file. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/26/2016) (kl)
|
|
Filing
32
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 23 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Frances, Joseph Ponte. For the foregoing reasons, I recommend that the defendants' motion for summary Judgment be granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from this date to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. (As further set forth in this Report and Recommendation.) Objections to R&R due by 3/7/2016 (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 2/18/2016) Copies Sent By Chambers. (kko)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
