Royal Park Investments SA/NV v. The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff: Royal Park Investments SA/NV
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Case Number: 1:2014cv06502
Filed: August 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge: Gregory H. Woods
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 77
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 209 ORDER APPROVING (1) DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND (2) NOTICE OF DISMISSAL TO CURRENT HOLDERS granting 205 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and: 1. The form of the proposed not ice of dismissal to current noteholders in the Trusts, attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Arthur C. Leahy in support of the Motion (the "Notice") is approved; 2. Within ten calendar days of this Order or a longer period as agreed to by the parties, except as to those trusts that have terminated pursuant to the trusts' governing agreements, The Bank of New York Mellon shall post the Notice to the trust investor reporting website, as to those trusts for wh ich The Bank of New York Mellon administers the website, or send the Notice to the person or entity that administers the trust investor reporting website and request that the Notice be posted, as to those trusts for which The Bank of New York Mellon does not administer the website; and 3. The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal attesting to the posting of the Notice and, if applicable, the absence of a substitute derivative plaintiff not less than 40 calendar days after the date of this Order. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/6/2020) (mro)
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 204 ORDER denying 202 Motion to Dismiss. On March 2, 2020, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.1(c). Dkt. No. 202. Because the parties have not given the Court sufficient information indeed any inf ormationto permit it to evaluate whether to approve the proposed dismissal and the proposed form and means of notice, the parties joint motion to dismiss is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at docket number 202. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/6/2020) (rro)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER: On November 18, 2019, the Court entered an order denying Royal Park's motion for sampling-related expert discovery. Dkt. No. 200. In accordance with its March 14, 2019 order, the Court now adopts the following schedule for the completion of discovery: Third-party written fact discovery shall be completed no later than February 18, 2020. Third-party depositions shall be completed no later than March 17, 2020. The parties shall exchange their initial expert reports no later than April 16, 2020 and their rebuttal expert reports no later than June 1, 2020. All expert discovery shall be completed no later than June 30, 2020.The Court expects to hold a pre-motion conference regarding any proposed motions for summary judgment after the close of expert discovery. At that time, the Court will set briefing schedules for any proposed summary judgment and Daubert motions. Pursuant to the authority of Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c)(2) and the Court's Individual Rule 2(C), any motion for sum mary judgment will be deemed untimely unless a request for a pre-motion conference relating thereto is made in writing within two weeks after the close of discovery. SO ORDERED., ( Deposition due by 3/17/2020., Expert Discovery due by 6/30/2020., Fact Discovery due by 2/18/2020.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 11/18/2019) (ama)
February 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 182 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 150 MOTION to Certify Class Plaintiff Royal Park Investments SA/NV's Notice of Renewed Motion and Renewed Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Representative and Class Counsel filed by Royal Park Investments SA/NV. Because the common questions of law and fact in this case do not predominate over the substantial individualized issues noted above, Royal Park's motion for class certification is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 150. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 2/15/2019) (anc)
August 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 140 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 99 MOTION to Certify Class Plaintiff Royal Park Investments SA/NV's Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Representative and Class Counsel. filed by Royal Park Investments SA/NV. Royal Park's motion for class certification is denied without prejudice. Any renewed motion should be filed within 45 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 99. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/30/17) (yv)
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 49 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by The Bank of New York Mellon. For the foregoing reasons, BNYM's motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. BNYM's motion to dismiss is denied with respect to Royal Park's breach of contract, breach of trust, and TIA claims under sections 315(b) and 315(c) of that act. BNYM's motion to dismiss is granted with respect to Royal Park's Streit Act claim and TIA claim under section 315(a). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 49. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/2/2016) (kko)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Royal Park Investments SA/NV v. The Bank of New York Mellon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Royal Park Investments SA/NV
Represented By: Arthur C. Leahy
Represented By: Steven W. Pepich
Represented By: Samuel Howard Rudman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Bank of New York Mellon
Represented By: Matthew D. Ingber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?