Belen v. Colvin

Belen v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Maria I. Belen
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	1:2014cv06898
Filed:	August 25, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	Paul G. Gardephe
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 9, 2020	Filing 39 ORDER for 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 26 MOTION for Attorney Fees. For the reasons stated above, Magistrate Judge Franciss R&R (Dkt. No. 33) is adopted in its entirety, and Plaintiff is awarded $6,036.96 in attorneys' fees and $400.00 in costs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 6/8/2020) (jca)
March 11, 2016	Filing 23 ORDER re: 16 Motion to Remand to Agency filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Maria I. Belen, 18 Report and Recommendations. In sum, this Court adopts Judge Francis's R&R in its entirety and, for the reasons stated therein, (1) denies Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings; (2) denies the Commissioner's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings; (3) remands the case for further administrative proceedings so that the A LJ can properly evaluate the medical evidence; and (4) denies Plaintiff's request to direct the Commissioner to issue a new decision within 120 days. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions (Dkt. Nos. 14, 16) and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 3/11/2016) (kko)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 9, 2020

Filing 39 ORDER for 33 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 26 MOTION for Attorney Fees. For the reasons stated above, Magistrate Judge Franciss R&R (Dkt. No. 33) is adopted in its entirety, and Plaintiff is awarded $6,036.96 in attorneys' fees and $400.00 in costs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 6/8/2020) (jca)

March 11, 2016

Filing 23 ORDER re: 16 Motion to Remand to Agency filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Maria I. Belen, 18 Report and Recommendations. In sum, this Court adopts Judge Francis's R&R in its entirety and, for the reasons stated therein, (1) denies Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings; (2) denies the Commissioner's cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings; (3) remands the case for further administrative proceedings so that the A LJ can properly evaluate the medical evidence; and (4) denies Plaintiff's request to direct the Commissioner to issue a new decision within 120 days. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motions (Dkt. Nos. 14, 16) and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 3/11/2016) (kko)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Belen v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria I. Belen
Represented By:	Charles E Binder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?