Kips Bay Endoscopy Center PLLC et al v. The Travelers Indemnity Company et al
| Kips Bay Endoscopy Center PLLC, Kips Bay Associates LLC, Kips Bay Anesthesia PC and Concorde Medical Group, PLLC |
| The Travelers Indemnity Company, The Phoenix Insurance Company, The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company and The Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv07153 |
| September 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
OPINION AND ORDER re: 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Kips Bay Associates LLC, Kips Bay Anesthesia PC, Kips Bay Endoscopy Center PLLC, Concorde Medical Group, PLLC, 18 MOTION to Sever filed by The Cha rter Oak Fire Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company, The Phoenix Insurance Company, 20 MOTION to Sever (Corrected Notice) filed by The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company, The Phoeni x Insurance Company. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion to remand the case to New York SupremeCourt is GRANTED and the Insurers' motion to sever is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 4, 18, and 20, and REMAND the case to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/24/2015) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
