Bretillot et al v. Burrow et al
| Audrey Bretillot and New York Tab Inc. |
| Clive Burrow, Urban Cart, Lindsay Perth, Landskapp, Ian Dewsbery, Lovell Johns, Rick Tardiff, Conrad Ayotte, J.S. McCarthy Printers, Mitchell Newman, Jim Berry and Mitchell's NY Data Movers |
| 1:2014cv07633 |
| September 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. At this point it is sufficient to find that the Objections are wholly without merit and are overruled. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. The petitioner's applications for a charging lien and a "qu asi-retaining lien" are denied. The petitioner's application for retaining lien is granted in the amount of $9,440. The petitioner's application for a judgment in quantum meruit is denied without prejudice. The documents pertainin g to this application should remain under seal. The defendants are precluded from using the documents and they are ordered to destroy whatever copies of these documents that remain in their possession or control at the conclusion of the litigation. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/24/2015) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
