Clinton v. USA

Clinton v. USA

Petitioner:	Keshawna Clinton
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2014cv07737
Filed:	September 22, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	Denise L. Cote
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 2, 2015	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER....Clintons petition of September 22, 2014 is denied. In addition, a certificate of appealability shall be not granted. The petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right and appellate review is, therefore, not warranted. Tankleff v. Senkowski, 135 F.3d 235, 241 (2d Cir. 1998); Rodriquez v. Scully, 905 F.2d 24, 24 (2d Cir. 1990). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal from this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 7/2/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers TO Keshawna Clinton. (gr)
October 30, 2014	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER....Clinton filed this petition on September 22, 2014, well over a year after her conviction became final in January 2011. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Clinton may make a submission by December 1, 2014 explaining why her petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Failure to file such an explanation will result in dismissal of the petition. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/30/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers To Keshawna Clinton(gr)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 2, 2015

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER....Clintons petition of September 22, 2014 is denied. In addition, a certificate of appealability shall be not granted. The petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a federal right and appellate review is, therefore, not warranted. Tankleff v. Senkowski, 135 F.3d 235, 241 (2d Cir. 1998); Rodriquez v. Scully, 905 F.2d 24, 24 (2d Cir. 1990). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), any appeal from this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). The Clerk of Court shall close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 7/2/2015) Copies Mailed By Chambers TO Keshawna Clinton. (gr)

October 30, 2014

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER....Clinton filed this petition on September 22, 2014, well over a year after her conviction became final in January 2011. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Clinton may make a submission by December 1, 2014 explaining why her petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Failure to file such an explanation will result in dismissal of the petition. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/30/2014) Copies Mailed By Chambers To Keshawna Clinton(gr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clinton v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Keshawna Clinton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?