Vision En Analisis Y Estrategia, S.A. et al v. Andersen et al
Vision En Analisis Y Estrategia, S.A. and Capitaliza-T, Sociedad De Responsabilidad Limitada De Dapital Variable |
Karl Andersen, Stavanger Holdings, Ltd., Hedmark Capital, Ltd., Kenneth A. Landgaard, Arthur L. Bowen, William C. Coyle, Brock Bagley, David Mickelson Insurance Services, Erwin Legal, P.C., Christopher R. Erwin, PW Insurance Agency Corp., Leon Lowenthal and Meyer Gertner |
1:2014cv08016 |
October 3, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Thomas P. Griesa |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 100 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 98 Memorandum & Opinion, . filed by Vision En Analisis Y Estrategia, S.A. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion [Docket No. 100]. SO ORDERED. (As further set forth within this Opinion.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/7/2015) (ajs) |
Filing 98 OPINION AND ORDER re: 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . filed by Karl Andersen, Stavanger Holdings, Ltd., Hedmark Capital, Ltd., 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Join Necessary Parties. filed by Karl Andersen, Stavanger Holdings, Ltd., Hedmark Capital, Ltd., 62 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . filed by Erwin Legal, P.C., David Mickelson Insurance Services, Christopher R. Erwin, 81 MOTION to Dismiss for F ailure to Join Necessary Parties and for Insufficient Service of Process. filed by Meyer Gertner, PW Insurance Agency Corp., Leon Lowenthal, 6 MOTION to Amend/Correct to Remove Non-Diverse Defendants In Amended Complaint As a Matte r of Course In Order to Preserve Diversity Jurisdiction. filed by Capitaliza-T, Sociedad De Responsabilidad Limitada De Dapital Variable, Vision En Analisis Y Estrategia, S.A. For the foregoing reasons, defendants Andersen, Gertner, Lowenthal , and PW's motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party pursuant to Rule 12(b)(7) is GRANTED and defendants' other motions to dismiss are moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these motions(Docket Nos. 4, 6, 22, 62, and 81) and this case. SO ORDERED. (As further set forth within this Order.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/24/2015) (ajs) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.