Merrick, D.C. et al v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Timothy Merrick, D.C., Joshua I. Kantor, D.C., Jason Piken, D.C. and Craig Fishel, D.C.
Defendant: UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare, Inc., UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., Optum Inc. and Optumhealth, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2014cv08071
Filed: October 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 77 OPINION AND ORDER re: 63 MOTION to Dismiss THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO PLAINTIFFS KANTOR, PIKEN, AND FISHEL filed by UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, UnitedHealthcare, Inc., UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., Optum Inc., Optum health, Inc. For the reasons set forth above, United's motion to dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 63, and to close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/25/2016) (kko) (Main Document 77 replaced on 3/25/2016) (kko).
August 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting 43 Motion to Compel Arbitration; terminating 43 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth above, United's Motion to Compel Arbitration of Merrick's claims is GRANTED and the claims brought by Merrick are STAYED as ag ainst all Defendants. The out-of-network Plaintiffs' claims against all Defendants remain. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 43. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/31/2015) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merrick, D.C. et al v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Merrick, D.C.
Represented By: Steven Lawrence Bloch
Represented By: Peter R. Kahana
Represented By: Russell David Paul
Represented By: Richard J. Quadrino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua I. Kantor, D.C.
Represented By: Steven Lawrence Bloch
Represented By: Peter R. Kahana
Represented By: Russell David Paul
Represented By: Richard J. Quadrino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Piken, D.C.
Represented By: Steven Lawrence Bloch
Represented By: Peter R. Kahana
Represented By: Russell David Paul
Represented By: Richard J. Quadrino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Fishel, D.C.
Represented By: Steven Lawrence Bloch
Represented By: Peter R. Kahana
Represented By: Russell David Paul
Represented By: Richard J. Quadrino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Represented By: Sloane Ackerman
Represented By: Danielle Carim Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UnitedHealthcare, Inc.
Represented By: Sloane Ackerman
Represented By: Danielle Carim Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc.
Represented By: Sloane Ackerman
Represented By: Danielle Carim Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Optum Inc.
Represented By: Sloane Ackerman
Represented By: Danielle Carim Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Optumhealth, Inc.
Represented By: Sloane Ackerman
Represented By: Danielle Carim Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?