Banegas et al v. The Mirador Corp. et al
| Lesby Banegas |
| The Mirador Corp., Mi Rancho Restaurant Bar Corp., Gustavo Ramirez and Mario Ramirez |
| 1:2014cv08491 |
| October 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Alison J. Nathan |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Within two weeks of this Order, Plaintiff may show cause in writing why this Court retained jurisdiction to enforce the agreem ent when it approved the settlement. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Dkt. No. 36. SO ORDERED. re: 36 MOTION for Judgment to Enforce Settlement Agreement filed by Lesby Banegas. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/17/2021) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER. On June 29, 2020, this Court ordered Defendants' former counsel to serve its Order on any remaining Defendants and to file proof of service on the public docket by July 6, 2020. Dkt. No. 42. As of the date of this Order, the Court has not received proof of service on the remaining defendants. Defendants' former counsel is hereby ordered to file proof of service with the Court within one week of the date of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/9/2020) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER: On April 28, 2020 the Court ordered Defendants to submit a response to Plaintiff's motion to enforce the settlement agreement by May 8, 2020, or the Court would deem it unopposed. See Dkt. No. 39. Defendants' former counsel s ubsequently responded that his representation ended upon approval of the settlement by the Court, but he was advised that the owner of the defendant business has since died and the defendant business has closed. Dkt. No. 40. Any remaining Defen dants shall respond to Plaintiffs motion by July 24, 2020. If the Court has not received a response by that date, it will deem Plaintiff's motion unopposed. Defendants' former counsel is ordered to serve this Order on any remaining Defendants and file proof of service on the public docket by July 6, 2020. SO ORDERED. ( Responses due by 7/24/2020.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 6/29/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: re: 33 Letter filed by Lesby Banegas. Finding the settlement, in its present form, fair and reasonable, the Court hereby approves the settlement. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 5/17/2017) (ama)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons explained in this Memorandum and Order, the Court cannot approve the settlement as currently proposed. The parties are hereby ORDERED to meet and confer about the settlement, and to file a revised settlement prop osal, along with the documents necessary for the Court to assess the settlement's reasonableness and fairness, no later than April 29, 2016. The Court will act on any revised settlement in short order. So ordered. Case reopened. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/12/2016) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
