Philips et al v. GTech Corporation et al
Plaintiff: George Philips and Rex Woodley
Defendant: GTech Corporation and Michael Feiler
Case Number: 1:2014cv09261
Filed: November 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 102 OPINION & ORDER re: 68 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by GTech Corporation, Michael Feiler. For these reasons, the Court grants defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Woodley's federal, state, and municipal discrimination claims; as to Woodley's federal and state hostile work environment claims; and as to all plaintiffs' "aiding and abetting" claims against Feiler. The motion is otherwise denied. In other words, Philip may procee d to trial against GTECH and Feiler on his discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environment claims; Woodley may proceed to trial against GTECH and Feiler on his NYCHRL hostile work environment claim; and Uddin may proceed to trial aga inst GTECH and Feiler on his hostile work environment claim. The Court directs the parties to meet and confer within three weeks of this decision about the prospect of settling this case, in whole or in part. By August 11, 2016, the part ies are to submit a joint letter alerting the Court to whether any plaintiffs claims have been successfully resolved. To the extent that a settlement has not been reached, a joint pretrial order will be due on September 23, 2016. After the Cou rt reviews the joint pretrial order, the Court's staff will contact counsel to schedule a trial date. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion pending at docket number 68. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/20/2016) (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Philips et al v. GTech Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Philips
Represented By: Brian Bodansky
Represented By: Lawrence Michael Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rex Woodley
Represented By: Brian Bodansky
Represented By: Lawrence Michael Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GTech Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Feiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?