Miles v. City of New York et al
| Thomas E. Miles |
| City of New York, John Doe, John and Jane Doe # 10-14, John and Jane Does # 15 through 20, John and Jane Does and John Doe and Jane Does |
| 1:2014cv09302 |
| November 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Vernon S. Broderick |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
OPINION AND ORDER re: 105 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. filed by Susi Vassallo, 109 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. filed by Duane Groce, Kevin Butt, Adam Vasquez, Manuel Gonzalez, City of New York, William Smith, Cynthia Acera, Sean Aman, Joseph McCreedy. For the foregoing reasons, the Defendants' motions to dismiss the TAC, (Docs. 105, 109), are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for Defendants and close this case. The Clerk of Court is instructed to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order and the judgment to the pro se Plaintiff. Furthermore, the Court certifies, pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith; therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purposes of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 8/3/2018) (rro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
