Network-1 Technologies, Inc. v. Google, Inc. et al
| Network-1 Technologies, Inc. |
| Google, Inc. and Youtube, LLC |
| 1:2014cv09558 |
| December 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul G. Gardephe |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
244
ORDER granting 242 Letter Motion to Seal. The application is granted, except as to the proposed redaction on page 63, paragraph 15-17. The proposed redactions are limited to technical information. Coverting the Context Id. system, and the Court fi nd that Commercial interests and desire to avoid competitive harm and outweigh the presumption of access. The Clerk of Court is directed to strike 14civ2396, Dkt. 303 and 14Civ.9558, Dkt No. 240 from the public docket and replace these documents with the redacted version to be supplied by Defendants. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 4/25/2024) (rro)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER: granting 213 Letter Motion to Seal. The application is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. No. 277 in 14 Civ. 2396 and Dkt. No. 213 in 14 Civ. 9558.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 9/21/2023) (ama)
|
|
Filing
219
ORDER granting 204 Letter Motion for Discovery. On October 7, 2022, the Court held a discovery conference to hear arguments regarding Defendants' motion to strike the portions of Plaintiff's supplemental expert report that relate to "the '216 patent." Under Rule 26(a)(1), a party has a continuing duty to supplement its production with documents it "may use to support its claims or defenses." Plaintiff's failure to affirmatively identify the '2 16 patent, especially during the supplemental discovery period, violated that duty. Defendants relied on Plaintiff's silence and would be unduly prejudiced by being made to challenge the '216 patent without the aid of additional discovery. Plaintiff may not now interject information relating to the '216 patent through its expert, and therefore Defendants' motion to strike paragraphs 38-147 of the Supplemental Expert Report prepared by Dr. Michael Mitzenmacher is GRANTED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 10/14/2022) (ras)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER granting 201 Letter Motion for Discovery. Google will provide Network-1 with the updated financial data referenced in this letter by August 5, 2022. Network-1 will provide Google with any supplemental expert reports by August 26, 2022. G oogle will provide Network-1 with any supplemental rebuttal expert reports by September 16, 2022. Network-1 will file any supplemental briefing not to exceed 10 pages double-spaced regarding Google's pending motion for summary judgment by September 23, 2022. Google will file any responsive supplemental briefing not to exceed 10 pages double-spaced by September 30, 2022. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe on 7/11/2022) (ks)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER granting (222 in case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN, 157 in case 1:14-cv-09558-PGG-SN), Letter Motion to Seal; granting (247 in case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN, 182 in case 1:14-cv-09558-PGG-SN), Letter Motion to Seal; denying (248 in case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-S N, 183 in case 1:14-cv-09558-PGG-SN), Letter Motion for Discovery; denying (249 in case 1:14-cv-02396-PGG-SN, 184 in case 1:14-cv-09558-PGG-SN), Letter Motion for Discovery. As discussed at the April 22, 2021 Conference, the Court DENIES Network-1� 39;s motion to strike Google's supplemental discovery responses. The scope of this limited discovery shall be determined by the parties through a meet-and-confer process. In addition, the Court GRANTS the parties' requests to file certain d ocuments under seal related to the discovery dispute, and GRANTS on an interim basis the parties' request to file certain documents under seal related to the summary judgment briefing. This interim sealing ruling may be revisited by Judge Gardep he in connection with his ruling on the motions for summary judgment. The parties shall file a status letter on May 6, 2021, indicating if there are any outstanding discovery disputes. Respectfully, the Clerk of Court is directed to GRANT the motions at 14-cv-02396, ECF Nos. 222, 247; and at 14-cv-09558, ECF Nos. 157, 182, and DENY the motions at 14-cv-02396, ECF Nos. 248, 249; and at 14-cv-09558, ECF Nos. 183, 184. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 4/23/2021) (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
