Taupita Investments, Ltd. et al v. Leung et al
Plaintiff: Taupita Investments, Ltd. and Segue Corporation
Defendant: Benny Ping Wing Leung and First Toronto Realty Corp.
Case Number: 1:2014cv09739
Filed: December 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 191 OPINION & ORDER re: 87 MOTION to Dismiss filed by EFG Bank & Trust (Bahamas) Ltd.; 89 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Jury Trial Demand filed by First Toronto Realty Corp., Benny Ping Wing Leung; 97 THIRD PARTY MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 filed by EFG Bank & Trust (Bahamas) Ltd.; 72 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 filed by Steven Mackey, Urbacon Buildings Group Corp., Segue C orporation, Taupita Investments, Ltd. For the foregoing reasons, the Court (1) grants plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Leung'scounterclaims; (2) grants EFG's motions to dismiss Leung's and First Toronto's third-party claims; a nd (3) denies the motion to strike plaintiffs' jury trial demand without prejudice to defendants' right to renew the motion closer to trial. The Clerk of Court is thus respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkts. 72, 87, 89, and 97. SO ORDERED. (First Toronto Realty Corp. (a Delaware Corporation), Benny Ping Wing Leung (an individual), Steven Mackey (a Bahamian individual), Segue Corporation (a Bahamian entity), Taupita Investments, Ltd. (a Bahamian entity), Urbacon Buildings Group Corp. (A Bahamian entity), EFG Bank & Trust (Bahamas) Ltd. terminated.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 8/17/2017) (anc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taupita Investments, Ltd. et al v. Leung et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taupita Investments, Ltd.
Represented By: Wayne Russel Glaubinger
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Lam
Represented By: Jon Edward Quint
Represented By: Glen H. Waldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Segue Corporation
Represented By: Wayne Russel Glaubinger
Represented By: Jeffrey R. Lam
Represented By: Jon Edward Quint
Represented By: Glen H. Waldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benny Ping Wing Leung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Toronto Realty Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?