Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Wrights Mill Holdings, LLC et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| Wrights Mill Holdings, LLC, Brogno, LLC, Eton Park Capital Mangement, Montrose Credit I, LLC, Montrose Credit II, LLC, Montrose Credit III, LLC, Montrose Credit IV, LLC, Waterfall Asset Management, Moishe Gubin, Cede & Co. and Does 1 through 100 |
| 1:2014cv09783 |
| December 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Gubin's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and grants Montrose's motion for a judgment on the pleadings, to the extent that Montrose seeks a declaration that the Trustee la cks authority, under the Indenture, to sell the Security to Gubin as directed by WMH on October 14, 2014. The Court also denies Gubin's motion to strike exhibits attached to Waterfall's submissions. Because the Court's resolution of these motions leaves no live controversy, the Court denies all other requests for relief as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions, and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 8/31/2015) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
