Robainas et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
| Maria Del Carmen Robainas, Giovanni Valladares, Jose A. Capablanca, Modesto Martin, Jacqueline J. Russ, Allen Perez and Gregory Truitt |
| MEtropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metlife, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv09926 |
| December 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs Maria Robainas and others (Plaintiffs) brought a putative class action on behalf of those who purchased life insurance from Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MLIC or Defendant). MLIC moves to dismiss the complaint o n four grounds: (1) the Plaintiffs lack standing under Article III; (2) the Plaintiffs fail to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); (3) the primary jurisdiction doctrine bars the Court from adjudicating this action; and (4) the statute of li mitations has run. For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs do not have Article III standing because they have failed to demonstrate that they suffered an injury-in-fact. The Court therefore lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over the action and MLICs motion to dismiss is granted....The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for MLIC and close the case. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/9/2015) (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
