Jane Doe v. City of New York, et al

Jane Doe v. City of New York, et al

Case Number:	1:2015cv00117
Filed:	November 21, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 13, 2019	Filing 254 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons above, Defendants' motion to redact the Order is DENIED except as to the sentences describing the third-pai1y statements. The Court filed the Order on the public docket with these redactions on November 21, 2018. Dkt. No. 197. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/13/2019) (kv)
November 21, 2018	Filing 197 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants moved for partial summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, that motion is granted in part and denied in part. (As further set forth in this Order.) Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is granted as to Claims 2, 3, 13, 14, 21, 22, and the portions of Claim 32 related to training its connection officers specifically as to sexual safety, inadequate hiring practices, and inadequate monitoring of inmates. The motion for partial summ ary judgment is denied on the remaining claims. This resolves docket number 160. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an affidavit of Timothy Ryan is granted. This resolves docket number 180. A scheduling conference is hereby set for November 7, 2018 at 10 a.m, In advance of that conference, the parties shall confer and determine several mutually agreeable dates for trial and a proposed schedule for the filing of pre-trial materials. The parties shall also confer regarding settlement and indicate to the Court in advance of the November 7 conference whether they seek a referral to either the Magistrate Judge or the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties shall file a status letter with the Court by October 31 2018 regard ing proposed dates for trial and whether a settlement referral is sought. Because this Memorandum Opinion and Order may reference information that the parties seek to maintain under seal, the Court will file it under TEMPORARY SEAL. The parties ar e directed to meet and con for and submit within 10 days any proposed redactions for the version of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to be filed on the public docket. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, they may set forth their respect ive positions in letter briefs not to exceed three pages in length. Although the Court will publicly docket an order announcing its bottom-line conclusion, it will refrain from publicly docketing this Memorandum Opinion and Order until it has ruled on the proposed redactions. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/28/2018) (cf)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 13, 2019

Filing 254 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons above, Defendants' motion to redact the Order is DENIED except as to the sentences describing the third-pai1y statements. The Court filed the Order on the public docket with these redactions on November 21, 2018. Dkt. No. 197. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/13/2019) (kv)

November 21, 2018

Filing 197 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants moved for partial summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, that motion is granted in part and denied in part. (As further set forth in this Order.) Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment is granted as to Claims 2, 3, 13, 14, 21, 22, and the portions of Claim 32 related to training its connection officers specifically as to sexual safety, inadequate hiring practices, and inadequate monitoring of inmates. The motion for partial summ ary judgment is denied on the remaining claims. This resolves docket number 160. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an affidavit of Timothy Ryan is granted. This resolves docket number 180. A scheduling conference is hereby set for November 7, 2018 at 10 a.m, In advance of that conference, the parties shall confer and determine several mutually agreeable dates for trial and a proposed schedule for the filing of pre-trial materials. The parties shall also confer regarding settlement and indicate to the Court in advance of the November 7 conference whether they seek a referral to either the Magistrate Judge or the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties shall file a status letter with the Court by October 31 2018 regard ing proposed dates for trial and whether a settlement referral is sought. Because this Memorandum Opinion and Order may reference information that the parties seek to maintain under seal, the Court will file it under TEMPORARY SEAL. The parties ar e directed to meet and con for and submit within 10 days any proposed redactions for the version of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to be filed on the public docket. If the parties are unable to reach agreement, they may set forth their respect ive positions in letter briefs not to exceed three pages in length. Although the Court will publicly docket an order announcing its bottom-line conclusion, it will refrain from publicly docketing this Memorandum Opinion and Order until it has ruled on the proposed redactions. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/28/2018) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jane Doe v. City of New York, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?